eDiscipline.org


«« Go Back

Penal Code 1970

Defamation

Section 479. Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or 
by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation 
concerning any person, intending to harm , or knowing or having reason to 
believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, 
except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person.  

    Explanation 1: It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a 
    deceased person if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person 
    if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or 
    other near relatives. 

    Explanation 2: It may amount to defamation to make an imputation 
    concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.

    Explanation 3: An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed 
    ironically, may amount to defamation.

    Explanation 4: No imputation is said to harm a person's reputation unless 
    that imputation, directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers
    the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character 
    of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the 
    credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that 
    person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as 
    disgraceful.    

Illustrations
    (a) A says -  "Z is an honest man; he never stole B's watch"; intending to 
    cause it to be believed that Z did steal B's watch. This is defamation, 
    unless it falls within one of the exceptions. 

    (b) A is asked who stole B's watch. A points to Z, intending to cause it to 
    be believed that Z stole B's watch. This is defamation, unless it falls 
    within one of the exceptions.    

    (c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B's watch, intending it to be 
    believed that Z stole B's watch. This is defamation, unless it falls within 
    one of the exceptions.

First exception:-  It is not defamation to impute anything which is true  
concerning any person, if it be  for the public good that the imputation should 
be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of 
fact. 

Second exception:- It is not defamation to express in good faith any 
opinion whatever  respecting the conduct  of a public servant in the discharge 
of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his  character 
appears in that conduct and no further.

Third exception:-  It is not defamation to express in good faith any 
opinion whatever  respecting the conduct  of any person touching any public 
question, and respecting his character, so far as his  character appears in that
conduct and no further.

Illustration
It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion whatever 
respecting Z's conduct in petitioning Government on a public question, in 
signing a requisition for meeting on a public question, in presiding or a 
tending at such meeting, in forming or joining any society which invites the 
public support, in voting or canvassing for a particular candidate for any 
situation in the efficient discharge of the duties of which the public is 
interested. 

Fourth exception:- It is not defamation to publish  a substantially true 
report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice or of the result of any 
such proceedings.
        
Explanation:- A  Magistrate or other officer holding an inquiry in open court 
preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice is a court within the meaning 
of the above exception.  

Fifth exception:- It is not defamation to express in good faith any 
opinion whatever respecting the merits  of any case, civil or criminal, which 
has been decided by a court of justice, or respecting the conduct of any person 
as a party, witness, or agent in any such case  or respecting  the character of 
such person  as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further. 

Illustrations
    (a) A says- " I think Z's evidence on that trial is so contradictory that he 
        must be stupid or dishonest." A is within this exception if he says this 
        in good faith, inasmuch as the opinion which he expresses respects Z's 
        character as it appears in Z's conduct as a  witness, and no further.
    (b) But if A says- " I do not believe what Z asserted at that trial, because
        I know him to be a man without  veracity " A is not within this 
        exception , inasmuch as the opinion which he expresses of Z's 
        character is an opinion not founded on Z's conduct as a witness.

Sixth exception:- It is not defamation to express in good faith any 
opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted 
to the judgment of the public , or respecting the character of the author so 
far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.

Explanation:- A performance may be submitted to the judgment of the public 
expressly or by acts on the part of the author which imply such submission to 
the judgment of the public.

Illustrations
    (a) A person who publishers a book submits that book to the judgment of the 
        public.
    (b) A person who makes a speech in public submits that speech to the 
        judgment of the public.
    (c) An actor or signer who appears on a public stage submits his acting or 
        signing to the judgment of the public.
    (d) A says of a book publishers by Z- "Z's book  is foolish ,Z must be a 
        weak man, Z's book is indecent, Z must be a man of impure mind" A is 
        within this exception if he says this in good faith, inasmuch as the 
        opinion which he expresses of Z respects Z's character only so far as it 
        appears in Z's book, and no further.
    (e) But if A says – "I am not surprised  that Z's book is foolish and 
        indecent, for he is a weak man and a libertine" A is not within this 
        exception, inasmuch as the opinion which he expresses of Z's character 
        is an opinion not founded on Z's book.


Seventh exception:- It is not defamation in a person having over another 
any authority ,either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made 
with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other 
in matters to which such lawful authority relates. 

Illustration
A judge censuring in good faith the conduct of a witness, or for an officer of 
the court; a head of a department  censuring in good faith those who are under 
his orders; a parent, censuring in good faith a child in the presence of other 
children; a schoolmaster whose authority is derived from a parent, censuring in 
good faith a pupil in the presence of other pupils; a master censuring a servant
in good faith for remissness in service; a banker censuring in good faith the 
cashier of his bank for the conduct of such cashier as such cashier – are within 
this exception.

Eighth exception:- It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an 
accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over 
that person with respect to the subject matter of accusation.

Illustrations
If A in good faith accuses Z before a Magistrate ; if A in good faith complains 
of the conduct of Z, a servant to Z's master ; if A in good faith complains of 
the conduct of Z a child to Z's father- A is within this exception.

Ninth exception:- It is not defamation to make an imputation on the 
character of another,  provided that the imputation be made in good faith for 
the protection of the interests of the person making it, or of any other person, 
or for the public good.				

Illustrations
    (a) A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business "Sell nothing to Z 
        unless he pays you ready money , for I have no opinion of his honesty". 
        A is within the exception if he has made this imputation on Z in good 
        faith for the protection of his own interests.
    (b) A, a public servant in making a report to his superior officer casts an 
        imputation on the character of Z . Here if the imputation is made in 
        good faith and for the public good, A is within the exception.  

Tenth exception:- It is not defamation to convey a caution , in good 
faith to one person against another , provided that such caution be intended for 
the good of the person to whom it is conveyed, or of some person in whom that 
person is interested, or for the public good. 

Section 480. Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple 
imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine or with 
both. 

Section 481. Whoever prints or engraves any matter, knowing or having 
good reason to believe that such matter is defamatory of any person shall be 
punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or 
with fine  or with both.

Section 482. Whoever sells or offers for sale any printed or engraved 
substance containing defamatory matter,  knowing that it contains such matter  
shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two 
years or with fine  or with both.
Section 482A. Whoever having been sentenced to a term of twelve months' 
imprisonment or upwards for an offence punishable under this Chapter shall again 
be convicted of any offence punishable under this Chapter shall be liable for 
every such subsequent conviction at the description of the court to imprisonment 
of either description which may extend to two years, or to fine or to both such 
punishments. 

OF CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION, INSULT , AND ANNOYANCE

Section 483. Whoever threatens another with any injury to his person, 
reputation or property or to the person or reputation of any one in whom that 
person is interested with intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that 
person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do , or to omit to do any 
act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of avoiding the  
execution of such threat, commits criminal intimidation . 

Explanation:-  A threats to injure the reputation of any deceased person in whom 
the person threatened is interested is within this section.

Illustrations
A, for the purpose of inducing B to desist from prosecuting a civil suit, 
threats to burn B's house. A is guilty of criminal intimidation.

Section 484. Whoever intentionally insults and thereby gives provocation 
to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will 
cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence shall be 
punished with imprisonment  of either description for a term  which may extend 
to two years, or with fine or with both.

Section 485. Whoever  circulates or publishers any statement, rumor, or 
report which he knows to be false with intent to cause any officer, sailor, 
soldier, or airman in the navy, army, or air force of her Majesty to mutiny, 
or with intent to cause fear or alarm to the public and thereby to induce any 
person to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquility 
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may 
extent to two years or with fine or with both.

Section 486. Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation shall 
be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend 
to two years, or with fine or with both; and if the threat be to cause death or 
grievous hurt or to cause the destruction of any property by fire or to cause 
an offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for term which may extend 
to seven years, or to impute unchastity to a woman shall be punished with 
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years or 
with fine or with both.

Section 487. Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation by an 
anonymous communication or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode 
of the person from whom the threat comes shall be punished with imprisonment of 
either description for a term which may extend to two years in addition to the 
punishment provided for the offence by the last preceding section.

Illustration
A, writes an anonymous letter threatening B and sends it to C living with B 
expecting and believing C would show the letter to B ; A is guilty under this 
section.

Section 488. Whoever in a state of intoxication appear in any public 
place or in any place which it is a trespass in him to enter and there conducts 
himself in such a manner as to cause annoyance to any person shall be punished 
with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine 
which may extend to one hundred rupees or with both.

Of Unlawful Oaths

Section 489. Whoever administers or causes to be administered or abets 
the administering or taking of any oath, engagement or obligation in the nature 
of an oath, purporting or intending to bind the person taking the  same to 
commit or abet the commitment of any offence or takes any such oath, engagement 
or obligation , if the offence to which the oath, engagement or obligation 
relates be punishable with death or imprisonment for twenty years shall be 
punished with imprisonment of either description which may extend to twenty 
years or with fine or both and if the offence is punishable with imprisonment 
for less than twenty years  shall be punished with such punishment as may be 
awarded for the offence to which such oath , engagement or obligation relates. 
    

Of Attempts To Commit Offence

Section 490. Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable by this 
Code with imprisonment or to cause such an offence to be committed and in such 
attempt does any act towards the commission of the offence shall where no 
express provision is made by this code for the punishment of such attempt be 
punished with imprisonment of either description provided for the offence for a 
term which may extend to one-half of the longest term provided for that offence 
or with such fine as is provided for the offence or with both.  

Illustrations
    (a) A makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box, and 
        finds after so opening the box that there is no jewel in it. He has done 
        an act towards the commission of theft and therefore is guilty under 
        this section.
    (b) A, makes an attempt to pick the pocket of Z by thrusting his hand in to 
        Z's pocket. A fails in the attempt in consequence of Z having nothing in 
        his pocket. A is guilty under this section.                           

«« Go Back to Our Legal Section


Our Partners

Our Partners on the World Wide Web

Stay Informed

Subscribe to our e-news letter. Recieve all the latest info, right to your inbox.